HYBRID - GIGALIGHT

12Jan, 2026

The Parallel Evolution Logic and Industry Choices of HYBRID, LPO, LRO, and DSP— Why HYBRID Is More Practical Than LRO from a System Engineering Perspective

I. Introduction: Parallel Coexistence, Not a Battle of Routes

As AI and data center interconnects rapidly advance toward 800G and 1.6T, LPO, LRO, and traditional DSP-based optical modules are not engaged in a “winner-takes-all” replacement battle. Instead, constrained by different system requirements, transmission distances, and levels of industry maturity, they form a long-term pattern of parallel coexistence.

Within this parallel framework, HYBRID (semi-DSP) solutions—representing a more engineering-oriented intermediate architecture—are demonstrating clear advantages over typical LRO solutions in terms of overall system and industrial value.

Based on a systematic review of the parallel evolution logic of LPO, LRO, and DSP, and combined with real-world 800G HYBRID product implementations, this paper compares the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and focuses on a key question:

Why is HYBRID more practical and advantageous than LRO in real-world deployment?

II. Review of the Three Fundamental Architectures: DSP, LPO, and LRO

1. DSP-Based Modules: The “Ballast Stone” of Performance and Ecosystem

(1)Architecture Characteristics：Full DSP on both TX and RX sides

(2)Advantages

Strongest signal processing capability (equalization, CDR, FEC, nonlinear compensation)
Supports medium, long, and ultra-long reach transmission
Mature industry ecosystem, complete standards, true plug-and-play

(3)Disadvantages

High power consumption (800G typically >14–16 W)
Higher latency
Highest cost

(4)Typical Applications

Metro networks, backbone networks, DCI
Mission-critical links with extreme reliability requirements

2. LPO: Ultimate Power Efficiency with the Deepest System Coupling

(1)Architecture Characteristics : No DSP inside the module . Signal processing fully shifted to the host SerDes

(2)Advantages

Lowest power consumption (30–50% reduction compared to DSP)
Ultra-low latency
Lowest module BOM cost

(3)Disadvantages

Extremely stringent requirements on host SerDes and channel consistency
Limited transmission distance (typically ≤100m)
Complex system tuning and immature ecosystem

(4)Typical Applications

Intra-rack and inter-rack ultra-short-reach interconnects in AI clusters

3. LRO: A Conceptual Compromise

(1)Architecture Characteristics : DSP retained on TX side,Linear RX architecture

(2)Advantages

Lower power consumption than full DSP
Better reach capability than LPO

(3)Practical Challenges

Highly fragmented TX simplex DSP implementations
Poor chip reusability and weak economies of scale
Ecosystem has not reached mainstream adoption

III. HYBRID: A More Engineering-Mature “Semi-DSP” Path

1. The Essential Definition of HYBRID

HYBRID is not simply equivalent to LRO. Instead, it is a system-level DSP resource reallocation methodology:

HYBRID = Only half of the TX/RX paths inside the module pass through DSP, and for the module-level transmit/receive links, only TX or RX passes through DSP,while the remaining paths adopt linear architectures.

Conceptually, this can be understood as: HYBRID ≈ (LRO + LTO) / 2

Below is the patented HYBRID architecture description from GIGALIGHT:

HYBRID 800G Multimode Architecture Diagram (Patent Applied)

HYBRID 800G Single-Mode Architecture Diagram (Patent Applied)

HYBRID 800G Copper Cable Architecture Diagram (Patent Applied)

2. Key Differences: HYBRID vs. LRO

Dimension	LRO	HYBRID
DSP Type	TX simplex DSP	Mature duplex DSP
Chip Reusability	Very low	High, reuse of existing DSP
Market Scale	Niche, customized	Scalable, mass-producible
Supply Chain Risk	High	Low
System Consistency	Medium, one-side linear	Medium, one-side linear

Core Conclusion:
HYBRID does not introduce a new class of highly specialized DSP chips. Instead, it reuses mature duplex DSP architectures and simply reduces the number of active channels.

Furthermore, early system-level validation shows that certain LTO-based system links can even outperform LRO links, reinforcing HYBRID’s clear advantage over LRO in real industrial deployment.

IV. Comprehensive Advantages and Practical Challenges of HYBRID Key Advantages of HYBRID

1. Key Advantages of HYBRID

Significant power reduction：~20–30% lower than full DSP solutions
Ultra-low link latency：DSP count reduced by half; latency comparable to LRO
Controllable signal quality：MMF 50m: PRE-FEC BER up to E-7 / E-8，SMF 500m: PRE-FEC BER up to E-10
Clear cost optimization：~20% cost reduction versus traditional DSP solutions
Support for higher channel density：Viable path toward 16-channel / 3.2T pluggable modules

2. Limitations and Challenges of HYBRID

Non-DSP RX paths place slightly higher requirements on host SI tuning
Requires system-level co-optimization rather than pure “plug-and-play”
Still in early stages of large-scale deployment, requiring customer-side collaboration

However, compared with LPO and LRO, the engineering and deployment risks of HYBRID are significantly more controllable.

V. The Inevitability of Parallel Coexistence: Why There Is No Single Winning Route

Scenario	Optimal Solution
≤100m, ultra-low latency	LPO
100m – 2km, power/performance balance	HYBRID / LRO
≥2km, maximum reliability	DSP

These three solutions address different system constraints and optimization targets, rather than forming a simple generational replacement relationship.

VI. Conclusion: HYBRID Is the Most Realistic Intermediate Solution

LPO is an idealized extreme solution
DSP is an irreplaceable foundational solution
HYBRID is currently the most engineering-feasible intermediate solution

Compared with LRO, HYBRID’s decisive advantage lies in the fact that:
It does not rely on highly specialized TX simplex DSPs with extremely limited market demand, but instead reuses mature, scalable duplex DSP architectures.

This enables HYBRID to achieve clear overall competitiveness in power consumption, cost, ecosystem maturity, supply chain stability, and system-level deployment.

In the foreseeable future, LPO, HYBRID, and DSP will continue to coexist, jointly forming the technological foundation of AI and data center interconnects.

About GIGALIGHT

As an open optical networking explorer, GIGALIGHT integrates the design, manufacturing, and sales of both active and passive optical devices and subsystems. The company’s product portfolio includes optical modules, silicon photonics modules, liquid-cooled modules, passive optical components, active optical cables, direct attach copper cables, coherent optical communication modules, and OPEN DCI BOX subsystems. GIGALIGHT focuses on serving applications such as data centers, 5G transport networks, metropolitan WDM transmission, ultra-HD broadcast and video, and more. It stands as an innovative designer of high-speed optical interconnect hardware solutions.

26Dec, 2025

GIGALIGHT Launches 800G HYBRID Green Optical Interconnect Products, Driving Category Innovation for AI & DC Interconnects

December 26, 2025, Shenzhen, China. – Driven by design innovation, GIGALIGHT today officially announced the launch of its 800G OSFP HYBRID AI & DC optical interconnect product portfolio.

The new portfolio includes:
800G OSFP-PHO DR8 / 2×DR4 heterogeneous optical modules
800G OSFP HYBRID PSM8-AOC active optical cables
800G OSFP-PHO VR8 / 2×VR4 heterogeneous optical modules
800G OSFP HYBRID VR8-AOC active optical cables

Unlike traditional full-DSP optical modules (DPO), the HYBRID architecture adopts DSP on only half of the channels, significantly reducing power consumption and latency.

HYBRID optical modules and active optical cables draw on the widely adopted LPO / LRO design methodologies in the industry. However, from the perspective of strict system-level signal alignment, HYBRID introduces a more advanced and balanced design strategy.

The HYBRID design philosophy can be simply expressed as:HYBRID = (LTO + LRO) / 2

Notes:
LRO: DSP on TX side with linear RX
LPO: Fully linear, DSP-less design
LTO: DSP on RX side with linear TX

1. HYBRID 800G Multimode PHO Modules & AOC Reference Design— Up to 30% Power Saving vs. Traditional DPO

HYBRID 800G Multimode Architecture Diagram (Patent Applied)

HYBRID 800G Multimode Product Portfolio:

(1) 800G OSFP-PHO VR8, 50 m, Dual MPO-12/APC—Max power consumption < 9 W,~30% lower power compared to existing DSP solutions;
(2) 800G OSFP-PHO 2×VR4, 50 m (Under development)—Supports 2×400G VR4 heterogeneous system interconnects;
(3) 800G OSFP HYBRID VR8-AOC, 50 m

2. HYBRID 800G Heterogeneous Silicon Photonics Modules & AOC Design—~22% Power Saving

HYBRID 800G Single-Mode Architecture Diagram (Patent Applied)

HYBRID 800G Single-Mode Product Portfolio:

(1) 800G OSFP-PHO DR8, 500 m, Dual MPO-12/APC(Optional MPO-16/APC)—Max power consumption < 12 W,
~22% lower power vs. traditional DSP solutions;
(2) 800G OSFP-PHO 2×DR4, 500 m (Under development)—Supports 2×400G DR4 heterogeneous system interconnects;
(3) 800G OSFP HYBRID PSM8-AOC, 500 m

Q1: What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of HYBRID?

Key Advantages:

Lower Power Consumption : ~20%–30% power reduction compared with full-DSP solutions, effectively easing thermal and energy challenges in high-density port deployments.
Ultra-Low Latency : ~50% latency reduction versus traditional DSP architectures, making it ideal for latency-sensitive AI computing and high-speed interconnects.
Excellent Signal Quality : Multimode OM4 @ 50 m: Pre-FEC BER of E-7 / E-8,Single-mode @ 500 m: Pre-FEC BER of E-9 / E-10,Ensures robust and stable system operation.
Significant Cost Optimization : ~21% total cost reduction compared with conventional DSP solutions.
Reference Value for DSP Vendors : Provides new architectural insights for next-generation DSP optimization.

Challenges and Limitations

Non-DSP RX Requirements : In LRO-like architectures, the host system must perform signal integrity parameter matching.In long-term loopback testing, blind tuning shows symbol error counts <10, indicating room for further system-side optimization.
Early-Stage Adoption : Commercial large-scale deployment is still in its early phase and requires ecosystem and customer support.

Q2: Why Is HYBRID Needed?

HYBRID optical modules and active optical cables leverage mature LPO / LRO architectures, while introducing more advanced system-level signal alignment strategies.

By applying DSP to only half of the channels, HYBRID achieves:
Lower power consumption
Reduced latency
Lower overall cost

The HYBRID design methodology enables the feasibility of 16-channel / 3.2T pluggable optical modules, paving the way for next-generation ultra-high-speed interconnects.

Q3: What AI & DC Interconnect Products Does HYBRID Support?

HYBRID supports:
Multimode VCSEL platforms
Single-mode silicon photonics platforms
Active copper + optical (ACC+) platforms
The HYBRID architecture can also support PCIe over optics applications.

Product Status & Roadmap

As of this announcement, GIGALIGHT has completed the design of:
400G QSFP-DD HYBRID VR8
800G OSFP HYBRID VR8 / DR8 optical modules and AOCs

Samples are available for customer evaluation.The 1.6T OSFP224 HYBRID 2×DR4 silicon photonics module is currently under development and is scheduled for mass availability in Q2 2026.

GIGALIGHT looks forward to working closely with industry partners and customers to jointly accelerate the large-scale adoption and value realization of the HYBRID design methodology in next-generation AI and data center networks.